Looking for complete, textbook-verified solutions for SEBA Class 9 Social Science History Chapter 3 (The Moamoriya Rebellion / মোৱামৰীয়া গণ-বিদ্ৰোহ) for the 2026–27 academic session? Access step-by-step solutions to all official textbook exercises—including Very Short Answer (VSA), Short Answer (SA), and Long Answer (LA) questions. Master high-scoring answers covering the socio-political and religious origins of the rebellion; the clash between Saktism promoted by Queen Phuleswari and Neo-Vaishnavite Mayamara (Moamoriya) Satras founded by Aniruddhadeva; royal insults inflicted upon Satradhikar Chaturbhujdev and Naharkhora Saikia; decay and exploitation of the compulsory Paik labor system; the outbreak of the First Moamoriya Rebellion (1769) during Swargadeo Lakshmi Singha’s reign; capture of Rangpur and accession of Ramakanta; the Second Rebellion (1782) under Gaurinath Singha and the revenge of Purnananda Burhagohain; the Third Rebellion (1786) led by Bharat Singha and Harihar Tanti; the dispatch of Captain Thomas Welsh’s expedition (1792–1794); the recall of Welsh by Sir John Shore; long-term socio-economic consequences that dismantled the 600-year Ahom kingdom and paved the way for Burmese invasions; prepared strictly according to the Assam Board (SEBA) examination pattern.
Q.1. What is Mayamara?
Answer: Mayamara was the name of a Vaishnava Sattra belonging to the Kaal Songhoti, whose disciples primarily included the Moran tribe as well as various other tribes and castes.
Q.2. What is Sattra?
Answer: A Sattra is a Vaishnavite monastery or institution in Assam established for religious teachings, cultural practices, and spiritual guidance.
Q.3. What is Songhoti?
Answer: Songhoti refers to the institutional divisions or federations into which the various Vaishnava Sattras of Assam were grouped following the post-Sankar-Madhab period.
Q.4. During the reign of which Ahom King did the Moamoriya Rebellion begin?
Answer: Swargadeo Laksmi Singha
Q.5. During the reign of which Ahom King did the Moamoriya Rebellion conclude?
Answer: Swargadeo Kamaleswar Singha
Q.6. Which Ahom King is said to have adopted the title of Swargadeo/Swarganarayan?
Answer: Suhungmung (Dihingia Raja)
Q.7. During the reign of Surampha Bhagaraja which Sattradhikar was murdered?
Answer: Guru Nityanandadeva, the Sattradhikar of Mayamara Sattra
Q.8. Which Sattradhikar was humiliated in the royal court of Rudra Singha?
Answer: Chaturbhujdev Mahanta (the Sattradhikar of Mayamara Sattra)
Q.9. Who was the chief deity of the Ahoms?
Answer: Somdev (Chumdeo)
Q.10. Which Satradhikar did Jaydhwaj Singha accept as his religious preceptor?
Answer: Satradhikar Niranjandev of Auniati Sattra
SEBA Class 9 History Chapter 3 Solutions
Q.11. Which Satradhikar did Rudra Singha accept as his religious preceptor?
Answer: Keshabdev of Auniati Sattra
Q.12. Who was Krishnaram Bhattacharya?
Answer: Krishnaram Bhattacharya was a Shakta Brahmin Pandit from Nadiya in Bengal who was summoned to Assam by Rudra Singha to promote Shaktism, and whose successors came to be known as Parbatiya Gosain.
Q.13. During which Ahom King’s reign did Shaktism become very strong?
Answer: Swargadeo Siva Singha (under the powerful influence of Queen Phuleswari)
Q.14. Who was Gagini?
Answer: Gagini was the son of Moamoriya Mahanta Ashtabhuj, who called upon the disciples to construct a borbheti at Malou pothar near Jorhat.
Q.15. Whom did the Moamoriyas first establish as King?
Answer: Ramakanta (or Ramananda), the son of Nahor khora Saikia
Q.16. How long did Captain Welsh stay in Assam?
Answer: From November 1792 to May 1794 (about 18 months)
Q.17. Where was salt produced in Assam?
Answer: Small amounts of inferior quality salt were produced in Sadiya and the Naga hills.
Q.18. Why were the common people of Assam unable to use salt?
Answer: Salt was an extremely expensive imported commodity, and due to a severe scarcity of money and low purchasing power, common people could not afford it.
The Moamoriya Rebellion Textual Questions SEBA 2026-27
Short/Long Questions
Q.1. Who were the Moamoriyas? Can this rebellion be called a mass uprising?
Ans: The Moamoriyas were the disciples and followers of the Mayamara Vaishnava Sattra belonging to the Kaal Songhoti. They primarily consisted of the Moran tribe, along with other communities like the Kacharis, Chutiyas, Ahoms, and Kaibarttas. Yes, this rebellion can truly be called a mass uprising because it was not a mere palace conspiracy or elite coup; rather, it involved innumerable common people, simple peasants, artisans, and professionals who rose collectively against years of feudal oppression and Ahom royal tyranny.
Q.2. Analyse the political causes of the Moamoriya Rebellion.
Ans: The major political causes of the Moamoriya Rebellion included:
- Royal Repression and Murders: The execution of Mayamara Satradhikars like Guru Nityanandadeva under Surampha Bhagaraja and Baikunthadeva under Gadadhar Singha created deep resentment.
- Decline of Central Authority: After King Rudra Singha, the Ahom monarchy gradually weakened, allowing self-serving high officials and bureaucrats to accumulate power and indulge in misgovernance.
- Arrogance of Officials: The insulting and high-handed behavior of powerful officials like Kirtichandra Borbarua—who abused the Mayamara Mahanta and brutally flogged and mutilated rebel leaders like Ragha Moran and Nahor khora—served as the immediate political trigger for open revolt.
Q.3. Do you think the change in the religious policy of the Ahoms was a cause of the Moamoriya Rebellion? Discuss.
Ans: Yes, the shift in the religious policy of the Ahom rulers was a primary cause of the rebellion. Initially, the Ahoms followed a policy of empathy toward the Sattras, but Gadadhar Singha adopted a policy of domination, viewing Sattras as parallel kingdoms. Later kings, influenced by Brahmanical Shaktism brought by figures like Krishnaram Bhattacharya, openly patronized Brahmanical Sattras while discriminating against and humiliating the Sudra-led Mayamara Sattra and its disciples (such as forcing them to wear blood-stained tilaks). This severe religious bias and persecution deeply wounded the religious sentiments of the Moamoriyas, driving them to rebel.
Q.4. How far was the paik system responsible for the Moamoriya Rebellion? Give your own opinion.
Ans: The Paik system was heavily responsible for the socio-economic grievances underlying the rebellion. Under this system, every able-bodied male citizen aged 15 to 50 had to render compulsory manual or military service to the state. The Moamoriyas—who were hardworking peasants, expert craftsmen, and artisans producing weapons, boats, and building materials—were heavily exploited by the Ahom machinery. Furthermore, when King Rajeshwar Singha reduced got membership from four paiks to three, the labor obligation increased from three to four months per year. This extra burden of menial labor, combined with social inequality between Kanri and Chamua paiks, pushed the exploited masses to rise in arms.
Q.5. Discuss the results of the Moamoriya Rebellion.
Ans: The Moamoriya Rebellion had profound and disastrous results for Assam:
- Political Destruction: The three-decade-long civil war completely shattered the Ahom monarchy and feudal administration, leaving the kingdom vulnerable.
- British Intervention: Seeking rescue from internal chaos and rebels, the Ahom king invited the British, allowing Captain Welsh and the East India Company to establish a permanent political foothold and gather strategic intelligence.
- Socio-Economic Devastation: Widespread violence, destruction of crops, and reciprocal atrocities caused severe famines, loss of skilled artisan populations, and a heavy reliance on a primitive barter economy using salt and gold.
- Creation of the Matak Kingdom: The treaty between Purnananda Burhagohain and Sarbananda Singha led to the formation of the independent Matak Rajya in Bengmara (Tinsukia).
Class 9 Social Science History Chapter 3 Question Answer Assam Board
Q.6. Do you think the Moamoriya Rebellion was successful or unsuccessful? Give logic for your answer.
Ans: The Moamoriya Rebellion can be viewed as neither wholly successful nor completely unsuccessful. It was successful in its immediate socio-political objectives of challenging and breaking the oppressive feudal hegemony of the Ahom rulers, ending oppressive royal discrimination against their Sattra, and successfully establishing autonomous rule under leaders like Bharat Singha and Sarbananda Singha (resulting in the Matak Kingdom). However, it was ultimately unsuccessful in establishing a stable, centralized alternative government for the whole of Assam. Internal factionalism among the rebels, economic ruin, and the resulting vacuum led directly to devastating Burmese invasions and subsequent British colonization, destroying the sovereignty of Assam entirely.
Q.7. Under what circumstances did Captain Welsh come to Assam? Why did he leave his expedition incomplete and go back?
Ans: Captain Thomas Welsh came to Assam in November 1792 under circumstances of extreme political crisis. King Gaurinath Singha had been repeatedly driven out of his capitals and major towns by successful Moamoriya uprisings, local tributary revolts (such as those of the Darrang Raja and Haradutta Choudhury), and marauding bands of Bengal burkandazes. With the Ahom administration completely collapsed, the King begged the British East India Company for military assistance. Captain Welsh left his expedition incomplete and returned in July 1794 because the new Governor General, Sir John Shore, strictly adopted a policy of non-intervention and ordered him to withdraw immediately, ignoring pleas from the Ahom King.
Q.8. Describe the role played by Captain Welsh in suppressing the Moamoriya Rebellion. How far was he successful?
Ans: Captain Welsh played a crucial role by bringing disciplined military force to stabilize the collapsing Ahom state. Upon arriving in November 1792, he successfully reoccupied Gauhati, defeated the rebellious Darrang Raja and burkandazes, suppressed local uprisings, and signed the Anglo-Ahom Trade Treaty of 1793. Subsequently, marching to Upper Assam alongside Assamese forces, he defeated the rebels, injured Bharat Singha, and successfully reinstated Swargadeo Gaurinath Singha in Rangpur on March 21, 1794. He was successful in restoring temporary military order and clearing rebel camps, but his mission remained incomplete due to his premature recall by Governor General Sir John Shore.
Q.9. Discuss the Captain Welsh’s Account of Assam.
Ans: Captain Thomas Welsh submitted a valuable official report and descriptive account of Assam to Governor General Sir John Shore, providing extensive insights into the 18th-century eco-political condition of the region. His account details the Ahom system of royal succession, ministerial powers, bitter factional bickering, the dictatorship of Kirtichandra Borbarua, and the mechanics of the Paik system. Economically, he highlighted that Assam had a flourishing trade with Bengal yielding about rupees 90,000 annually (though only a fraction reached the royal treasury), recorded the extreme scarcity and high cost of imported salt, detailed agricultural output, and described the fortified yet war-damaged states of urban centers like Gauhati and Rangpur.
Assam Board Class 9 History Chapter 3 Solved Textbook Solutions PDF
Short Notes
1. Kirtichandra Barua
Ans: Kirtichandra Borbarua was a powerful and ambitious Ahom official belonging to the Dihing Sattra who held intense hostility toward the Mayamara Sattra. Driven by personal ego and vested interests, he continuously humiliated the Mayamara Mahanta and brutally assaulted tribal leaders Nahor khora Saikia and Ragha Moran during a tax submission. These arbitrary acts of violence served as the immediate spark that ignited the Moamoriya Rebellion.
2. Mayamara Sattra
Ans: Mayamara Sattra was a prominent Vaishnava Sattra founded in the post-Sankar-Madhab period under the Kaal Songhoti. Run by Sudra preceptors (Mahantas), it gained immense popularity among lower-caste groups and tribal communities—especially the Morans, Kacharis, and Chutiyas—by offering them a unique sense of social dignity. Its rising power and subsequent persecution by Ahom monarchs formed the epicenter of the Moamoriya Rebellion.
3. Purnananda Burhagohain
Ans: Purnananda Burhagohain (son of Ghanashyam Burhagohain) was a brilliant, courageous, and deeply dedicated Ahom administrator who steered the kingdom through its darkest existential crisis. Operating from Jorhat as the new capital, he trained villagers in warfare, reorganized defense, and protected his subjects like a bird protects its fledglings. Through astute diplomacy and military resolve, he contained the rebellions and concluded a historic treaty with Sarbananda Singha to establish the Matak Kingdom.
4. Kanri paik and Chamua paik
Ans: Under the Ahom Paik system, active male citizens were divided into these two primary classes. Kanri paiks formed the vast majority of ordinary laborers and soldiers who performed physical and manual state service in rotation. Chamua paiks held a higher social status and were legally exempted from physical menial labor in lieu of paying land revenue taxes. An increase in Chamua paiks over time doubled the burden on Kanri paiks, breeding severe social inequality and discontent.
5. Trade treaty between Welsh and Gaurinath Singha
Ans: Concluded on February 8, 1793, between Swargadeo Gaurinath Singha and Captain Thomas Welsh, this treaty formalised commercial ties and marked the beginning of British economic penetration in Assam. It levied a reciprocal 10% import and export tax on commodities traded between Assam and British-controlled territories, exempted grain and rice entirely from taxation, established custom houses at Gauhati and Kandahar, and barred other European traders from operating in Assam without joint British-Ahom permission.
6. Bar Raja Phuleswari
Ans: Phuleswari was the influential chief queen (“Bor Raja”) of Ahom King Siva Singha during whose reign Shaktism flourished aggressively. She exercised enormous political power and initiated state-sponsored repression against Vaishnava Sattras, infamously compelling the Mayamara Mahanta to wear a tilak made from the blood of sacrificed animals. This severe religious humiliation deepened sectarian rifts and sowed the seeds of the Moamoriya Rebellion.
7. Parbatiya Gosain
Ans: Parbatiya Gosain refers to the line of powerful Shakta Brahmin preceptors originating from Krishnaram Bhattacharya—a scholar summoned from Nadiya in Bengal by Swargadeo Rudra Singha. Settled permanently atop the Nilachal Hill (Kamakhya temple complex) by royal patronage, Krishnaram and his successors exerted immense spiritual and political influence over successive Ahom monarchs, firmly establishing Shaktism as a dominant court religion.
8. Sarbananda
Ans: Sarbananda Singha was a prominent Moamoriya leader who established an independent feudal rule in Bengmara (present-day Tinsukia) during the tumultuous phase of the rebellion. To prevent a permanent alliance between Sarbananda’s forces, the Singphos, and the Burmese, Purnananda Burhagohain signed a treaty with him in 1805. By this agreement, his territory between the Brahmaputra and Dihing rivers was recognized as the independent Matak Rajya, and Sarbananda assumed the title of Borsenapati.
9. Bharat Singha
Ans: Bharat Singha was a close relative of the Mayamara Mahanta whom the rebel forces installed as king after they successfully captured the Ahom capital in 1786. He served as a principal symbol of Moamoriya political authority in Upper Assam, successfully resisting royal forces for years until he was badly injured and his power crushed during the joint assault led by British and Assamese troops under Captain Welsh.
10. Rangpur city
Ans: Rangpur was the historical capital city of the Ahom Kingdom, characterized by extensive brick-walled fortifications spanning a boundary of about 20 miles. Surrounded by highly fertile agricultural lands owned primarily by the King and high officials, it served as the core administrative center and prime target during the Moamoriya Rebellion. Repeatedly captured, looted, and damaged by rebel factions and foreign skirmishes, it eventually witnessed the restoration of Ahom rule under Captain Welsh before the capital was shifted to Jorhat.
⚔️ Class 9 Social Science Solutions Notice: This page features the complete SEBA Class 9 Social Science (History Section) Chapter 3: The Moamoriya Rebellion Official Textual Questions and Answers updated for the 2026–27 academic session. Formatted according to the official Assam Board evaluation marking scheme, every core historical topic—from religious friction between the royal court and Mayamara Satras, oppression of the Paik system, and the three distinct phases of armed civil conflict to the intervention of Captain Thomas Welsh (1792) and the eventual collapse of Ahom administrative authority—is presented with point-wise clarity, statutory dates, and structured subheadings to help you secure full marks in your school unit tests, half-yearly exams, and annual examinations.
Master SEBA Class 9 History Textual Solutions:
- Having difficulty framing a comprehensive 5-mark answer detailing the socio-religious and administrative causes of the Moamoriya Rebellion, analyzing how Queen Phuleswari’s religious fanaticism alienated the disciples of the Mayamara Satra, or evaluating the lasting political and economic impact of Captain Welsh’s expedition to Assam? Leave your question in the comments section below!
- Bookmark this page for quick revision of dates, rebellion phases, key historical figures (Naharkhora Saikia, Ragha Moran, Purnananda Burhagohain, Captain Welsh), and administrative treaties before your unit evaluations, half-yearly exams, and final annual examinations.
- Share this link with your classmates and WhatsApp study groups to make Class 9 Social Science Assam history preparation structured, clear, and high-scoring!